<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Do&#039;s and Don&#039;ts: Website Architecture (Structure)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.westwardstrategy.com/blog/2007/seo-dos-and-donts-website-architecture-structure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.westwardstrategy.com/blog/2007/seo-dos-and-donts-website-architecture-structure/</link>
	<description>Information on Natural Search Optimization, Web Design, Web Site Maintenance, Internet Marketing &#38; SEO from a Reno Nevada marketing company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:08:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoney deGeyter</title>
		<link>http://www.westwardstrategy.com/blog/2007/seo-dos-and-donts-website-architecture-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoney deGeyter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.westwardstrategy.com/blog/2007/12/17/seo-dos-and-donts-website-architecture-structure/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your response Chris. For me, hyphens come down to usability. When you see hyperlinked urls you can miss the underscore and just think it is a space. Not a problem for clicking but if someone is remembering it it can cause problems. That and it takes two keys to type an underscore and only one for a hyphen. Just something to consider!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your response Chris. For me, hyphens come down to usability. When you see hyperlinked urls you can miss the underscore and just think it is a space. Not a problem for clicking but if someone is remembering it it can cause problems. That and it takes two keys to type an underscore and only one for a hyphen. Just something to consider!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.westwardstrategy.com/blog/2007/seo-dos-and-donts-website-architecture-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.westwardstrategy.com/blog/2007/12/17/seo-dos-and-donts-website-architecture-structure/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, it is simple. I wrote it that way on purpose.

By implementing these items the way I wrote them, 99 times out of 100 you will benefit from improved optimization. Yes, there are situations that fall outside these parameters and yes, it would be better to have an seo professional analyze your particular situation to determine the best possible course of action. However not everyone can do that, so here are a few quick tips.

Are absolute links going to have a severe negative impact on your site? In most cases, no.

Yes, javascript is great for hiding certain types of links, but do you want to do that for your main site navigation, in most cases no.

Aah, the hyphen vs. underscore battle. :)
Here&#039;s my take. I have used both in many different sites over the years and have not seen any benefit of one over the other. I&#039;ve had sites rank very well with both and I&#039;ve had others end up on page 98. I&#039;ve now gone completely to underscores in all url structures. Why?

The underscore has no place in natural language, notice I said natural language and not computer language, whereas the hyphen is used to connect the parts of a compound word, like &quot;short-term&quot; or &quot;self-motivation&quot;. Therefore it makes sense to use the underscore as a natural separator since the general population will never conduct a search in computer language syntax. Google messed this one up waaay back because it was built by computer geeks for computer geeks, computer geeks that search for things like &quot;FTP_BINARY&quot;. Leave the hyphen to do its job as a join in compound words.

I know this conversation can go round and round and round, and it has all over the internet. So, I don&#039;t think we need to get into a big long discussion, but I would love to hear your quick take on it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, it is simple. I wrote it that way on purpose.</p>
<p>By implementing these items the way I wrote them, 99 times out of 100 you will benefit from improved optimization. Yes, there are situations that fall outside these parameters and yes, it would be better to have an seo professional analyze your particular situation to determine the best possible course of action. However not everyone can do that, so here are a few quick tips.</p>
<p>Are absolute links going to have a severe negative impact on your site? In most cases, no.</p>
<p>Yes, javascript is great for hiding certain types of links, but do you want to do that for your main site navigation, in most cases no.</p>
<p>Aah, the hyphen vs. underscore battle. <img src='http://westwardstrategy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Here&#8217;s my take. I have used both in many different sites over the years and have not seen any benefit of one over the other. I&#8217;ve had sites rank very well with both and I&#8217;ve had others end up on page 98. I&#8217;ve now gone completely to underscores in all url structures. Why?</p>
<p>The underscore has no place in natural language, notice I said natural language and not computer language, whereas the hyphen is used to connect the parts of a compound word, like &#8220;short-term&#8221; or &#8220;self-motivation&#8221;. Therefore it makes sense to use the underscore as a natural separator since the general population will never conduct a search in computer language syntax. Google messed this one up waaay back because it was built by computer geeks for computer geeks, computer geeks that search for things like &#8220;FTP_BINARY&#8221;. Leave the hyphen to do its job as a join in compound words.</p>
<p>I know this conversation can go round and round and round, and it has all over the internet. So, I don&#8217;t think we need to get into a big long discussion, but I would love to hear your quick take on it. <img src='http://westwardstrategy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoney deGeyter</title>
		<link>http://www.westwardstrategy.com/blog/2007/seo-dos-and-donts-website-architecture-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoney deGeyter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.westwardstrategy.com/blog/2007/12/17/seo-dos-and-donts-website-architecture-structure/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>This list is far too simplistic. Some things you&#039;ve listed as either a do or don&#039;t an really go either way depending on the situation so further explanation is warranted.

For example, why must one always use absolute links? There are times when they are warranted, but they are simply not always needed or necessary.

I would NEVER use underscores. While Google is getting around to treating them as dashes that is still not the case and for usability issues, underscores are bad news.

Re javascript menus, this depends on the situation. There may be links that you DON&#039;T want indexed. Plus, Javascript menus do not automatically exclude spiders, depends on the implementation.

Anyway, just thought a little clarification was in order. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This list is far too simplistic. Some things you&#8217;ve listed as either a do or don&#8217;t an really go either way depending on the situation so further explanation is warranted.</p>
<p>For example, why must one always use absolute links? There are times when they are warranted, but they are simply not always needed or necessary.</p>
<p>I would NEVER use underscores. While Google is getting around to treating them as dashes that is still not the case and for usability issues, underscores are bad news.</p>
<p>Re javascript menus, this depends on the situation. There may be links that you DON&#8217;T want indexed. Plus, Javascript menus do not automatically exclude spiders, depends on the implementation.</p>
<p>Anyway, just thought a little clarification was in order. <img src='http://westwardstrategy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
